Crusader AXE is not in total agreement with Chief Defeatist Philosopher and Francois Villon Chair of the Solid Waste Disposal Department at Elistest Illiterate Tech Crispin Sartwell on the state. However, things like this make me wonder if some combination of Hegel and Sartwell might be a valid epistomological tool, modified by the realization that we're stuck in an eternal do-loop...things are fucked up, there's a solution, the solution fails because of its internal contradictions, things are fucked up, and so on ad infinitum. Purposeless, meaningless activity for eternity seems to me to define hell...so, maybe Crispin, Georg Wilhelm Freiedrich and AXE have a meeting in a new school of metaphysics...
Here's what got me thinking about this...
If this is a reasonable response, why do we need the nation-state? Or, multi-national states?
I just saw this particular piece about insurance companies providing armed escorts and establishing convoys for the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean. Seems that NATO, the UN, the EU and the various entities in that area have been unable to secure the seas and so private business has turned to the old profit motive. I immediately thought of letters of marque and the use of privateers...in other words, in a world in which austerity by government has passed economy and spiraled down to suicide, DYSTOPIA rules the waves. Now, I claim no expertise concerning the Law of the Sea, but I thought privateers and letters of marque went out with wigs, wooden ships, and the rise of the modern state. After all, the events that established the United States as a world player if not power were those against pirates in the Mediterranean. Great Britain became great behind the wooden walls of the Royal Navy. Hell, Julius Caesar first gained notice for action against pirates who had captured and ransomed him; Pompey became a hero of Rome (again) for eradicating the eastern Mediterranean of pirates. And on, and on and on...if government can not protect its commerce, care and educate its people, provide for the common defense, provide for the common defense thus securing the blessings of liberty for itself and its people then it has no purpose. Why do we need it? It's ironic that the the fast patrol boats the article alludes to are surplus Swedish Navy ships...the relevance of the Swedish Monarchy will soon be exceeded by the irrelevance of the nation state. Ayn Rand is chuckling in hell; Jefferson is shaking his head in heaven with Aristotle and Burke while sipping some suddenly bitter claret; Hobbs and Locke just spit coffee all over each other in shock in response to Drake's news as he walked in the Spectator Coffee House in Piccadilly ; and, Decatur, Jones and Hull are staring at each other utterly dumbfounded. As they should... A few things reassure me. Mercenaries have worked so well in the Horn of Africa and middle east in the past. I'm sure this future is as bright as any other flock of tame wild geese in history. Another is that bureaucracies get somewhat irate at threats to their survival. With the EU in economic disarray and the Greeks threatening the Euro, a private navy for rent protecting critical sea lanes might encourage the EU to do something kind of meaningful. Like imitate Jefferson and bitch slap some bad guys.
Comments