William F Buckley called out the John Birch Society; now Charles Blow of the NY Times is calling out Sarah Palin. Well, Blow is the sophisticated African-American conservative columnist of the Times, which is kind of interesting in itself. I guess he is the anti-Bob Herbert. However, their editorial choices are their business. Blow's column is actually about 80% worth reading. He begins by saying he won't ever write the woman's name again until she does something newsworthy, like announce that she's running for President or that she's not running for president. He points out with incredible accuracy that "She’s the Zsa Zsa Gabor of American politics. She once did something noteworthy, but she’s now just famous for being famous."
Then he loses it. Sarah Palin is the left's fault. Really? He blames the Huffington Post. After all, Megan McCain has called Sarah the Scene Whore out. Seriously? The left is paying her the money, giving her a spot on Fox News, buying her illiterate nonsense? He says that she is seldom heard on the popular Right websites or blogs. Seriously? The bimbo has a horrible reality show, a Fox News gig, and it's not the left that pays her to appear...she's got a standing offer from MSNBC to come on any of their shows, including Lockup! Travis Smiley or Charlie Rose would enjoy having her on PBS or Bloomberg, although Mayor Bloomberg, being a responsible man, might not want to sully his network. The man is deranged...
Actually, Blow is mirroring the conservatives who tried to ignore the Birch Society. One of the reasons that Buckley's excommunication of the Birchers was of historic note was that the majority of the country club conservative set had tried to go along to get along with the Birchers. Buckley responded as any Thomistic philosopher would -- the Birchers had to go because their positions were repugnant to reason.
The theory that Sarah Palin is qualified to be president is mind boggling -- yet, the majority of Republicans hem and haw and talk about the constitutional requirements and so on and well, that's the reason for the primaries and, and, and...or, come out and say that she is in fact qualified. Bullshit -- she creates a word "refudiation" and compares herself to Shakespeare and Marlowe because English is a living langauage. Well, then fuck and cunt should be used in polite discourse because Shakespeare and Marlowe used those words, ehh?
So, blaming the recession and the jobs numbers on Obama and the stimulus package is OK but Sarah Palin is not? The reason Keynesian economics has failed is because it hasn't been tried. The reason that Mr. Blow will probably have to continue typing her name on his computer is that the people he wants to pretend are not in the Republican party or are not the base of the current conservative movement in fact are in love with her. Sarah Palin is the queen of the flat earthers, the deniers, the folks who believe that if they close their eyes and pray real hard, God is going to give them a pony. Named Bristol.
It's really great post. I would like to appreciate your work and would like to tell to my friends.
Posted by: MAC Cosmetics | 05 December 2010 at 04:46 PM
The world is cute just because of us.The present young people like to dress themselves up different, in any case just to look like different from others.The suit manolo blahnik shoes upper body doesn't feel obtrusive, probably because of colour assortment is syncretic. So there can be such good effect.
Posted by: Coach Outlet | 05 December 2010 at 07:02 PM
You write really good articles, very attractive, I feel very shocked. I hope you can continue with your work, come on!
Posted by: Ray Ban Sunglasses | 05 December 2010 at 11:27 PM
You could even say **dazzling**, eh Ray? So bright ya gotta wear....?
Anywaya, look, I don't see how !**SARAH**! is any less qualified than, say, Eva Peron. So what's to complain about?
Posted by: sglover | 06 December 2010 at 03:09 PM
Goddam, Glover, you make me tremble. It could happen.
Posted by: oldfatherwilliam | 06 December 2010 at 07:59 PM
Glover, Old father -- help! Most comments are from these Outlet Store Groupies, and I'm starting to question the viability of existence...I envision some a-sexual folk on the subcontinent reading my stuff to improve their English and then getting jobs calling at dinner time to ask if I've considered buying an extended warranty on a car I wrecked 10 or so years ago...I tend to think Sarah Palin is a long shot since she's intellectually and effectively very lazy. She makes Reagan appear industrious and GWB appear to be a policy wonk. She likes being the brunette Ann Coulter, and I don't think she'll run for anything again. But, she is still frightening, because so many of our fellow citizens would jump on her bandwagon...
Posted by: Crusader AXE | 07 December 2010 at 12:25 AM
Cheer up, Crusader. I'm not exactly overflowing with confidence in our freedom-loving, oh-so-wise fellow "citizens", but every survey I've run across indicates that Palin's popularity drops a notch every time she opens her mouth. You'll never go broke bullshitting THE PEOPLE, but to their credit, most Americans seem to see Palin for exactly what she is, a celebrity. If you want an example of how close to power she can expect to get, consider the meteoric rise of Fred Thompson.
As for the bots, I think the old exiled Nigerian potentate scam had more pathos and mise en scene.
Posted by: sglover | 08 December 2010 at 08:32 AM
Just because the bandwagon will go off a cliff and crash, it'll probably crash into a busload of nuns and cripples headed off to a life-affirming event in either Lourdes or Disneyland.
Posted by: Crusader AXE | 08 December 2010 at 12:38 PM
Already bigger by magnitudes than Coulter. I think you're right that she won't run for office, but imagine a white, rightwing Oprah? There's a vacuum aborning there in any event. Megachurch guests, winger celebs, Nashville music. Gag a maggot, natch, but she could get way richer.
Posted by: oldfatherwilliam | 08 December 2010 at 06:50 PM
I stumbled across your site, and I think that your advise works for everyone, young at art or not! I especially loved the part about understanding what music has to do with your art.thank you!
Posted by: Coach Outlet | 10 December 2010 at 07:24 PM
You seem to grasp it though, so I think you ought to run with it.I will continue reading your post for it tackles different issues in our society that keeps me interested and go on reading the rest of your articles.all the best!
Posted by: mac cosmetics outlet | 21 January 2011 at 05:16 PM